Oddy, R (on the application of) v Bugbugs Ltd.
Pedicabs, as operated, fall within the statutory definition of stage carriage under section 4 of the Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869 because they ply for hire and charge separate fares; ex parte Lane does not apply due to different statutory language; the drivers did not solicit within the meaning of section 167 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 as there was no active invitation; costs were properly awarded against the prosecutor due to unnecessary prosecution.
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert David Oddy; Respondent: Bugbugs Ltd; Respondent: Navindh Baburam; Respondent: Slawomir Mlynarski
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates' Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Hackney Carriage, Definition of Stage Carriage, Soliciting Under Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, Costs in Criminal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert David Oddy
Applicant
Bugbugs Ltd
Respondent
Navindh Baburam
Respondent
Slawomir Mlynarski
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates' Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pedicabs are 'stage carriages' or 'hackney carriages' under the Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869
- 2 Whether the principles in R v Cambridge City Council ex parte Lane apply
- 3 Whether the drivers were 'soliciting' under section 167 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
Ratio Decidendi
Pedicabs, as operated, fall within the statutory definition of stage carriage under section 4 of the Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869 because they ply for hire and charge separate fares; ex parte Lane does not apply due to different statutory language; the drivers did not solicit within the meaning of section 167 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 as there was no active invitation; costs were properly awarded against the prosecutor due to unnecessary prosecution.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- District Judge's findings affirmed on all four questions
- Costs to be paid by the appellant to the respondents, subject to written submissions and assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment