Delaney, R. v

Delaney, R. v

The exclusion of the photographs of the complainant in a boxing stance did not render the conviction unsafe because the jury had sufficient evidence regarding the complainant's character and aggression, and there was no real possibility that the verdict would have been different had the photographs been admitted....

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Robert Ernest Delaney
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 January 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Evidence, Bad Character Evidence, Self Defence, Sentencing, Unlawful Wounding
Criminal Law Admissibility of Evidence Bad Character Evidence Self Defence Sentencing Unlawful Wounding

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Robert Ernest Delaney

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in excluding photographs of the complainant in a boxing stance as evidence of bad character relevant to self-defence
  2. 2 Whether the exclusion of this evidence rendered the conviction unsafe
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The exclusion of the photographs of the complainant in a boxing stance did not render the conviction unsafe because the jury had sufficient evidence regarding the complainant's character and aggression, and there was no real possibility that the verdict would have been different had the photographs been admitted. The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the offence and the sentencing guidelines.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction upheld
  • Sentence of 2 years' imprisonment upheld