Inches, R v
The Court of Appeal refused both the application for permission to appeal against sentence and the extension of time, holding that the correct procedure for varying SOPO terms is a structured application to the Crown Court, supported by evidence of changed circumstances. The SOPO was properly imposed in 2009, and the appellate court is not the proper venue for variation after such a delay.
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert Gavin Inches; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Sentence and for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Both applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (sopo), Appeals Against Sentence, Variation of Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Gavin Inches
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Sentence and for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the terms of the SOPO imposed in 2009 were manifestly excessive, wrong in principle, or oppressive
- 2 Whether the Court of Appeal should grant an extension of time for appeal
- 3 Whether the correct procedure for varying SOPO terms is through the Crown Court
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal refused both the application for permission to appeal against sentence and the extension of time, holding that the correct procedure for varying SOPO terms is a structured application to the Crown Court, supported by evidence of changed circumstances. The SOPO was properly imposed in 2009, and the appellate court is not the proper venue for variation after such a delay.
Court Disposition
Both applications refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal against sentence refused
- Application for extension of time refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment