Gray, R. v [2007] EWCA Crim 979 (22 February 2007)

Gray, R. v [2007] EWCA Crim 979 (22 February 2007)

The sentencing judge erred in not applying the guilty plea discount to the whole notional sentence, subject to the statutory minimum of 80% of three years. The correct approach is to apply the discount to the total sentence, provided the result does not fall below the statutory floor.

Citation
[2007] EWCA Crim 979
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Robert Gray
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Burglary, Guilty Plea Discount, Minimum Term, Statutory Interpretation
Criminal Law Sentencing Burglary Guilty Plea Discount Minimum Term Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Robert Gray

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in applying the guilty plea discount only to the portion of the sentence above the statutory minimum term under section 111 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, rather than to the whole notional sentence, subject to the 80% floor imposed by section 144 of the Criminal Justice Act 2005.

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge erred in not applying the guilty plea discount to the whole notional sentence, subject to the statutory minimum of 80% of three years. The correct approach is to apply the discount to the total sentence, provided the result does not fall below the statutory floor.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • sentence of three years and 229 days quashed
  • substituted sentence of 40 months' imprisonment for burglary