Pirtek (UK) Ltd v Jackson (Rev1) [2017] EWHC 2834 (QB) (09 November 2017)

Pirtek (UK) Ltd v Jackson (Rev1) [2017] EWHC 2834 (QB) (09 November 2017)

The claimant was entitled to default judgment for libel and malicious falsehood as the defendant failed to acknowledge service, file a defence, or provide evidence, and the unchallenged particulars of claim established publication, responsibility, falsity, malice, and serious financial loss. Summary relief, including damages, injunction, and costs, was appropriate as there was no viable defence and no reason for trial.

Citation
[2017] EWHC 2834
Parties
Claimant: Pirtek (UK) Limited; Defendant: Robert Jackson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Defamation and Malicious Falsehood Claim / Judgment in Default and Summary Disposal
Outcome
Default judgment for claimant; summary disposal granted.
Legal Topics
Libel, Malicious Falsehood, Default Judgment, Summary Disposal, Injunctions, Damages, Costs
Defamation Media Law Tort Libel Malicious Falsehood Default Judgment Summary Disposal Injunctions +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pirtek (UK) Limited

Claimant

Robert Jackson

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Defamation and Malicious Falsehood Claim / Judgment in Default and Summary Disposal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant published defamatory and maliciously false statements about the claimant
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction under s 10 of the Defamation Act 2013
  3. 3 Whether the statements caused or were likely to cause serious financial loss to the claimant under s 1(2) of the Defamation Act 2013

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant was entitled to default judgment for libel and malicious falsehood as the defendant failed to acknowledge service, file a defence, or provide evidence, and the unchallenged particulars of claim established publication, responsibility, falsity, malice, and serious financial loss. Summary relief, including damages, injunction, and costs, was appropriate as there was no viable defence and no reason for trial.

Court Disposition

Default judgment for claimant; summary disposal granted.

Orders

  • Permanent injunction restraining defendant from repeating or publishing similar allegations
  • Damages awarded in the sum of £10,000