Pirtek (UK) Limited v Robert Jackson

Pirtek (UK) Limited v Robert Jackson

The claimant is entitled to default judgment for libel and malicious falsehood as the defendant failed to acknowledge service, file a defence, or adduce evidence. The statements published were defamatory and maliciously false, causing serious financial loss. Summary disposal is appropriate as there is no viable defence and no reason for trial. The claimant is awarded damages, a permanent injunction, and costs.

Parties
Claimant: Pirtek (UK) Limited; Defendant: Robert Jackson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment in Default and Summary Disposal
Outcome
judgment for claimant
Legal Topics
Libel, Malicious Falsehood, Summary Disposal, Injunction, Damages, Costs
Defamation Malicious Falsehood Media Law Libel Summary Disposal Injunction Damages Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pirtek (UK) Limited

Claimant

Robert Jackson

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment in Default and Summary Disposal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the statements published by the defendant are defamatory and/or maliciously false
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction under s 10 of the Defamation Act 2013
  3. 3 Whether summary disposal and default judgment are appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is entitled to default judgment for libel and malicious falsehood as the defendant failed to acknowledge service, file a defence, or adduce evidence. The statements published were defamatory and maliciously false, causing serious financial loss. Summary disposal is appropriate as there is no viable defence and no reason for trial. The claimant is awarded damages, a permanent injunction, and costs.

Court Disposition

judgment for claimant

Orders

  • Permanent injunction restraining defendant from publishing or repeating defamatory or maliciously false statements about claimant
  • Damages awarded in the sum of £10,000