McCarthy, R v [2003] EWCA Crim 484 (27 February 2003)
The trial judge's directions were adequate and consistent with the principles in Powell and English; the appellant was party to a plan to attack the deceased with weapons, was present and participated, and the facts showed he was aware of the use of weapons during the attack. The conviction is safe.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Crim 484
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Appellant: Robert Joseph McCarthy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Joint Enterprise, Murder, Conspiracy to Cause Grievous Bodily Harm, Secondary Party Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Robert Joseph McCarthy
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's direction on joint enterprise was defective in light of R v Powell and English
- 2 Whether the appellant could be convicted of murder without knowledge of bladed weapons used in the attack
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's directions were adequate and consistent with the principles in Powell and English; the appellant was party to a plan to attack the deceased with weapons, was present and participated, and the facts showed he was aware of the use of weapons during the attack. The conviction is safe.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction for murder remains safe
- no change to sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment