R v Robert McDonagh

R v Robert McDonagh

The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive, the judge correctly applied the sentencing guidelines, considered mitigation, and the categorisation of the offence was appropriate given the serious harm caused and deliberate targeting of a vulnerable victim.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Robert McDonagh
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Renew Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Robbery, Sentencing, Appeals, Mitigation, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Robbery Sentencing Appeals Mitigation Totality Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Robert McDonagh

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Renew Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in categorising the offence as category B1
  3. 3 Whether sufficient credit was given for mitigation

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive, the judge correctly applied the sentencing guidelines, considered mitigation, and the categorisation of the offence was appropriate given the serious harm caused and deliberate targeting of a vulnerable victim.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Application for extension of time to renew application for leave to appeal against sentence is refused.