R v Robert Michael Thomas

R v Robert Michael Thomas

Given the appellant's persistent offending, repeated breaches of court orders, and failure of previous non-custodial disposals, a significant custodial sentence was justified. The sentence of 43 months' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive and was within the appropriate range, even after consideration of totality.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Robert Michael Thomas
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 March 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Theft, Breach of Criminal Behaviour Order, Sentencing, Possession of Controlled Drugs, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Theft Breach of Criminal Behaviour Order Sentencing Possession of Controlled Drugs Totality Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Robert Michael Thomas

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 43 months' imprisonment was manifestly excessive and disproportionate given the offending behaviour and application of the totality principle.

Ratio Decidendi

Given the appellant's persistent offending, repeated breaches of court orders, and failure of previous non-custodial disposals, a significant custodial sentence was justified. The sentence of 43 months' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive and was within the appropriate range, even after consideration of totality.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal against sentence is dismissed.