Ginger & Ors v Mickleburgh & Ors [2026] EWHC 100 (Ch) (23 January 2026)
Michael Gwilliam lacked testamentary capacity at the time of executing the 2014 will due to persistent delusional disorder and cognitive impairment, and the will was procured by fraudulent calumny by Sheila Gwilliam and Joan Brooks, rendering the will invalid.
- Citation
- [2026] EWHC 100 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Helen Ginger; Claimant: Georgina Charles; Claimant: Emily Gwilliam; Claimant: Caroline Gwilliam; Defendant: Robert Mickleburgh; Defendant: Sheila Gwilliam; Defendant: Joan Brooks
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Will of 3 December 2014 declared invalid; deceased died intestate.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Fraudulent Calumny, Validity of Will, Intestacy, Mental Health and Testamentary Disposition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Helen Ginger
Claimant
Georgina Charles
Claimant
Emily Gwilliam
Claimant
Caroline Gwilliam
Claimant
Robert Mickleburgh
Defendant
Sheila Gwilliam
Defendant
Joan Brooks
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased, Michael Gwilliam, had testamentary capacity at the time of executing the 2014 will
- 2 Whether the will was procured by fraudulent calumny by Sheila Gwilliam and Joan Brooks
- 3 Whether the deceased acted under delusions affecting the disposition of his estate
Ratio Decidendi
Michael Gwilliam lacked testamentary capacity at the time of executing the 2014 will due to persistent delusional disorder and cognitive impairment, and the will was procured by fraudulent calumny by Sheila Gwilliam and Joan Brooks, rendering the will invalid.
Court Disposition
Will of 3 December 2014 declared invalid; deceased died intestate.
Orders
- Probate refused for the 2014 will
- Estate to be distributed according to intestacy rules
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment