Powell, R (on the application of) v Tthe Brighton Marina Company Ltd & Ors
The Brighton Marina Act 1968 permits the extension, enlargement, alteration, or replacement of completed works after the statutory time limit, provided necessary approvals are obtained. Phase I works fall within the statutory powers and are authorised by the Act. Section 40 does not prohibit development outside its limits but defines the extent of development permitted by the Act.
- Parties
- Appellant: Robert Powell; First Respondent: The Brighton Marina Company Limited; Second Respondent: West Quay Development Company Partnership LLP; Third Respondent: Marine Management Organisation; Interested Party: Brighton and Hove City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal Against Refusal of Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; permission to apply for judicial review refused.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Statutory Powers, Development Consent, Interpretation of Private Acts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Powell
Appellant
The Brighton Marina Company Limited
First Respondent
West Quay Development Company Partnership LLP
Second Respondent
Marine Management Organisation
Third Respondent
Brighton and Hove City Council
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal Against Refusal of Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the power to extend, enlarge, alter, replace or relay works under section 5(2) of the Brighton Marina Act 1968 was subject to the time limit in section 23(1)
- 2 Whether the Phase I works constituted an authorised extension, enlargement or alteration of Work No. 6 under the Act
- 3 Whether section 40 of the Act impliedly prohibited development outside specified geographical limits
Ratio Decidendi
The Brighton Marina Act 1968 permits the extension, enlargement, alteration, or replacement of completed works after the statutory time limit, provided necessary approvals are obtained. Phase I works fall within the statutory powers and are authorised by the Act. Section 40 does not prohibit development outside its limits but defines the extent of development permitted by the Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; permission to apply for judicial review refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment