Clydesdale Financial Services Ltd & Ors v Smailes & Ors
The administrators were so closely involved in the negotiation and execution of the pre-pack sale to Jiva that they could not independently investigate its propriety; the legitimate concerns of the majority creditors justified their removal and replacement under paragraph 88 of Schedule B1. No impropriety was found, but the appearance of conflict and need for independent review warranted the order. Other grounds for removal were rejected. Focus's application for inspection of files was refused due to inadequate evidence and unresolved enforceability issues under FSMA.
- Parties
- Claimant: Clydesdale Financial Services Limited; Claimant: Justice Capital Limited; Claimant: Focus Insurance Company Limited; Defendant: Robert Smailes; Defendant: Jiva Solicitors LLP; Defendant: Other Defendants (including Mr Ryman)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency/administration / Interlocutory Application for Removal of Administrators and Related Interim Relief
- Outcome
- Administrators removed and replaced; other interim relief orders as specified; some claims struck out; Focus's application for inspection refused without prejudice to a renewed application.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Administrators, Pre Pack Administration Sales, Creditors' Rights, Disclosure and Inspection of Files, Standing to Sue Administrators, Misfeasance Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clydesdale Financial Services Limited
Claimant
Justice Capital Limited
Claimant
Focus Insurance Company Limited
Claimant
Robert Smailes
Defendant
Jiva Solicitors LLP
Defendant
Other Defendants (including Mr Ryman)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Insolvency/administration / Interlocutory Application for Removal of Administrators and Related Interim Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administrators should be removed and replaced under paragraph 88 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether the sale of LLP's assets to Jiva Solicitors LLP was at an undervalue and merits investigation
- 3 Whether Focus Insurance Company Limited is entitled to inspection of client files held by Jiva
Ratio Decidendi
The administrators were so closely involved in the negotiation and execution of the pre-pack sale to Jiva that they could not independently investigate its propriety; the legitimate concerns of the majority creditors justified their removal and replacement under paragraph 88 of Schedule B1. No impropriety was found, but the appearance of conflict and need for independent review warranted the order. Other grounds for removal were rejected. Focus's application for inspection of files was refused due to inadequate evidence and unresolved enforceability issues under FSMA.
Court Disposition
Administrators removed and replaced; other interim relief orders as specified; some claims struck out; Focus's application for inspection refused without prejudice to a renewed application.
Orders
- Removal of current administrators (Mr Smailes and Mr Ryman) and appointment of Stephen Hunt as administrator
- Dispensation with full service of the removal application on all creditors
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment