Clydesdale Financial Services Ltd & Ors v Smailes & Ors [2009] EWHC 1745 (Ch) (18 June 2009)
Administrators are removed and replaced due to legitimate creditor concerns, conflict of interest, and inability to independently investigate sale; no impropriety found but close involvement in sale negotiations justifies removal. Application for inspection of files by Focus is refused due to inadequate evidence and potential unenforceability of insurance policies.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 1745 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Clydesdale Financial Services Limited; Claimant: Justice Capital Limited; Claimant: Focus Insurance Company Limited; Defendant: Robert Smailes; Defendant: Mr Ryman; Defendant: Jiva Solicitors LLP; Defendant: Alexander Samuel LLP; Defendant: Alexander Samuel & Co
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Application / Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Administrators removed and replaced; application for inspection of files refused; certain claims struck out for lack of standing; permission to pursue proceedings adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Administrators, Pre Pack Administration, Creditor Consultation, Inspection of Client Files, Standing to Sue, Fiduciary Duty, Misfeasance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clydesdale Financial Services Limited
Claimant
Justice Capital Limited
Claimant
Focus Insurance Company Limited
Claimant
Robert Smailes
Defendant
Mr Ryman
Defendant
Jiva Solicitors LLP
Defendant
Alexander Samuel LLP
Defendant
Alexander Samuel & Co
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application / Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether administrators should be removed and replaced due to conflict of interest and creditor wishes
- 2 Whether Focus Insurance Company Limited is entitled to inspect client files held by Jiva Solicitors LLP
- 3 Standing of claimants to pursue claims for breach of fiduciary duty and misfeasance
Ratio Decidendi
Administrators are removed and replaced due to legitimate creditor concerns, conflict of interest, and inability to independently investigate sale; no impropriety found but close involvement in sale negotiations justifies removal. Application for inspection of files by Focus is refused due to inadequate evidence and potential unenforceability of insurance policies.
Court Disposition
Administrators removed and replaced; application for inspection of files refused; certain claims struck out for lack of standing; permission to pursue proceedings adjourned.
Orders
- Removal of current administrators and appointment of Stephen Hunt as replacement administrator.
- Refusal of Focus Insurance Company Limited's application for inspection of files.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment