Wooldridge, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 1410 (12 September 2023)

Wooldridge, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 1410 (12 September 2023)

The applicant's circumstances, including rehabilitation and mental health progress, did not amount to particular circumstances making the minimum sentence unjust; the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive and complied with statutory requirements.

Citation
[2023] EWCA Crim 1410
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Robert Wooldridge
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Minimum Sentencing, Drug Offences, Sentencing Guidelines, Mental Health Mitigation
Criminal Law Minimum Sentencing Drug Offences Sentencing Guidelines Mental Health Mitigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Robert Wooldridge

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the minimum sentence imposed was unjust in all the circumstances
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge applied the correct statutory test
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's rehabilitation and mental health issues constituted particular circumstances justifying departure from the minimum sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's circumstances, including rehabilitation and mental health progress, did not amount to particular circumstances making the minimum sentence unjust; the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive and complied with statutory requirements.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • sentence of 5 years and 6 months' imprisonment upheld
  • forfeiture and destruction of drugs ordered