Mersey Care NHS Trust v Ackroyd [2006] EWHC 107 (QB) (07 February 2006)
The court held that the claimant hospital was not entitled to an order requiring the defendant journalist to disclose his source, as the public interest in protecting journalistic sources and reporting on matters of legitimate public concern outweighed the hospital's interest in confidentiality. The Norwich Pharmacal jurisdiction was not established because the source may have had a public interest defence, and the court was not satisfied that wrongdoing had occurred justifying disclosure.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 107
- Parties
- Claimant: Mersey Care NHS Trust; Defendant: Robin Ackroyd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Disclosure Order (norwich Pharmacal) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Application for disclosure order dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Sources, Patient Confidentiality, Public Interest Defence, Norwich Pharmacal Jurisdiction, Breach of Confidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mersey Care NHS Trust
Claimant
Robin Ackroyd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Disclosure Order (norwich Pharmacal) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should order the defendant journalist to disclose his source for confidential medical records
- 2 Whether the Norwich Pharmacal jurisdiction applies where the source may have a public interest defence
- 3 Whether there was wrongdoing by the source justifying disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the claimant hospital was not entitled to an order requiring the defendant journalist to disclose his source, as the public interest in protecting journalistic sources and reporting on matters of legitimate public concern outweighed the hospital's interest in confidentiality. The Norwich Pharmacal jurisdiction was not established because the source may have had a public interest defence, and the court was not satisfied that wrongdoing had occurred justifying disclosure.
Court Disposition
Application for disclosure order dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment