Flynn v Robin Thompson & Anor [2000] EWHC 9004 (Costs) (25 February 2000)
The claimant's objections to the costs determination were dismissed as the issues had already been dealt with by the Taxing Officer and the order of the Queen's Bench Master, including costs, stood after unsuccessful appeals. The review process was not the appropriate remedy for the claimant.
- Citation
- [2000] EWHC 9004 (Costs)
- Parties
- Claimant: Flynn; Defendant: Robin Thompson & Anor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment/review / Review of Detailed Assessment and Objections
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Discharge of Legal Aid Certificate, Solicitor's Authority to Act, Costs of Application to Come Off Record, Assessment of Costs, Objections to Costs Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Flynn
Claimant
Robin Thompson & Anor
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment/review / Review of Detailed Assessment and Objections
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is liable for costs after discharge of Legal Aid Certificate
- 2 Whether solicitors had authority to apply to come off the record after discharge of Legal Aid Certificate
- 3 Whether costs of legal executive should be allowed
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's objections to the costs determination were dismissed as the issues had already been dealt with by the Taxing Officer and the order of the Queen's Bench Master, including costs, stood after unsuccessful appeals. The review process was not the appropriate remedy for the claimant.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Objections to disallowance of legal executive's costs dismissed
- Allowance of Mr Darby's costs at hearing upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment