Kingspan Group Plc & Anor v Rockwool Ltd (on costs) [2011] EWHC 1065 (Ch) (14 April 2011)
Kingspan is the overall winner and entitled to its costs, subject to a 10% discount to reflect its loss on the issue of malice and the failure of the malicious falsehood allegation.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 1065 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Kingspan Group PLC; Claimant: Kingspan Holdings (IRL) Limited; Defendant: Rockwool Limited; Claimant: Rockwool Limited; Defendant: Kingspan Group PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property / Costs Judgment
- Outcome
- Kingspan awarded 90% of its costs of the actions.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Trade Mark Infringement, Malicious Falsehood, Comparative Advertising
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kingspan Group PLC
Claimant
Kingspan Holdings (IRL) Limited
Claimant
Rockwool Limited
Defendant
Rockwool Limited
Claimant
Kingspan Group PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property / Costs Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to costs following mixed success in intellectual property litigation
- 2 Appropriate discount for unsuccessful malicious falsehood claim
- 3 Issue-based costs orders
Ratio Decidendi
Kingspan is the overall winner and entitled to its costs, subject to a 10% discount to reflect its loss on the issue of malice and the failure of the malicious falsehood allegation.
Court Disposition
Kingspan awarded 90% of its costs of the actions.
Orders
- Kingspan is entitled to 90% of the costs of the actions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment