Goodings, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2586 (26 October 2012)
The sentencing judge erred in principle by sentencing the applicant on the basis of facts relevant to section 4 of the Identity Documents Act 2010, when the applicant had pleaded guilty only to the lesser offence under section 6. The sentence must reflect the offence actually admitted, not a more serious one for which the prosecution did not proceed.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Crim 2586
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Roderick Goodings
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Identity Documents, Sentencing, Possession of False Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Roderick Goodings
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred by taking into account factors relevant to a more serious offence than that to which the applicant pleaded guilty
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for possession of another's identity document without reasonable excuse under section 6 of the Identity Documents Act 2010
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred in principle by sentencing the applicant on the basis of facts relevant to section 4 of the Identity Documents Act 2010, when the applicant had pleaded guilty only to the lesser offence under section 6. The sentence must reflect the offence actually admitted, not a more serious one for which the prosecution did not proceed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- sentence of six months' imprisonment quashed
- substituted sentence of two months' imprisonment imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment