Goodings, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2586 (26 October 2012)

Goodings, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2586 (26 October 2012)

The sentencing judge erred in principle by sentencing the applicant on the basis of facts relevant to section 4 of the Identity Documents Act 2010, when the applicant had pleaded guilty only to the lesser offence under section 6. The sentence must reflect the offence actually admitted, not a more serious one for which the prosecution did not proceed.

Citation
[2012] EWCA Crim 2586
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Roderick Goodings
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Identity Documents, Sentencing, Possession of False Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Roderick Goodings

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred by taking into account factors relevant to a more serious offence than that to which the applicant pleaded guilty
  2. 2 What is the appropriate sentence for possession of another's identity document without reasonable excuse under section 6 of the Identity Documents Act 2010

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge erred in principle by sentencing the applicant on the basis of facts relevant to section 4 of the Identity Documents Act 2010, when the applicant had pleaded guilty only to the lesser offence under section 6. The sentence must reflect the offence actually admitted, not a more serious one for which the prosecution did not proceed.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • sentence of six months' imprisonment quashed
  • substituted sentence of two months' imprisonment imposed