Gardner v Parker
The rule against reflective loss bars the appellant's claims as both shareholder and creditor because the losses claimed are reflective of the company's loss, and the exception to the rule does not apply as there is no evidence the company was disabled from suing due to the respondent's wrongdoing.
- Parties
- Appellant: Rodney Mark Gardner; Respondent: Alan Parker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Reflective Loss, Fiduciary Duty, Shareholder Claims, Creditor Claims, Double Recovery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rodney Mark Gardner
Appellant
Alan Parker
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the rule against reflective loss bars the appellant's claim for damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a shareholder and creditor of a company.
- 2 Whether the exception to the rule against reflective loss established in Giles v Rhind applies due to the 1995 Settlement.
- 3 Whether the rule against reflective loss applies to claims by creditors as well as shareholders.
Ratio Decidendi
The rule against reflective loss bars the appellant's claims as both shareholder and creditor because the losses claimed are reflective of the company's loss, and the exception to the rule does not apply as there is no evidence the company was disabled from suing due to the respondent's wrongdoing.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Any ancillary issues to be dealt with at a later date
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment