Gardner v Parker

Gardner v Parker

The rule against reflective loss bars the appellant's claims as both shareholder and creditor because the losses claimed are reflective of the company's loss, and the exception to the rule does not apply as there is no evidence the company was disabled from suing due to the respondent's wrongdoing.

Parties
Appellant: Rodney Mark Gardner; Respondent: Alan Parker
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 June 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Reflective Loss, Fiduciary Duty, Shareholder Claims, Creditor Claims, Double Recovery

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rodney Mark Gardner

Appellant

Alan Parker

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the rule against reflective loss bars the appellant's claim for damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a shareholder and creditor of a company.
  2. 2 Whether the exception to the rule against reflective loss established in Giles v Rhind applies due to the 1995 Settlement.
  3. 3 Whether the rule against reflective loss applies to claims by creditors as well as shareholders.

Ratio Decidendi

The rule against reflective loss bars the appellant's claims as both shareholder and creditor because the losses claimed are reflective of the company's loss, and the exception to the rule does not apply as there is no evidence the company was disabled from suing due to the respondent's wrongdoing.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Any ancillary issues to be dealt with at a later date