LIBYAN INVESTMENT AUTHORITY & Ors v ROGER KING & Ors
Permission to rely on Mr Elliott's late witness statement is granted because, although the delay was serious and significant, the claimants provided a reasonable and credible explanation for the timing, acted promptly once the evidence was identified, and there is no specific prejudice to the defendants or disruption to the trial. The Denton principles are satisfied in all the circumstances.
- Parties
- Claimant: Libyan Investment Authority; Claimant: LIA Advisory Services (UK) Limited; Claimant: Maplecross Holdings Investment Company Limited; Defendant: Roger King; Defendant: International Group Limited; Defendant: Beeson Property Investments Limited; Defendant: Stoke Park Estates (formerly known as Beeson Investments); Defendant: Charles Merry; Defendant: Conrad Strategic Partners Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Pre Trial Review (ptr), Application for Permission to Rely on Late Witness Statement
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Relief From Sanctions, Admission of Late Evidence, Witness Statements, Joint Venture Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Libyan Investment Authority
Claimant
LIA Advisory Services (UK) Limited
Claimant
Maplecross Holdings Investment Company Limited
Claimant
Roger King
Defendant
International Group Limited
Defendant
Beeson Property Investments Limited
Defendant
Stoke Park Estates (formerly known as Beeson Investments)
Defendant
Charles Merry
Defendant
Conrad Strategic Partners Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Pre Trial Review (ptr), Application for Permission to Rely on Late Witness Statement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to rely on the late witness statement of Mr Ian Elliott under CPR 32.10
- 2 Whether the Denton principles for relief from sanctions apply and are satisfied
- 3 Whether the claimants provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in serving the witness statement
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to rely on Mr Elliott's late witness statement is granted because, although the delay was serious and significant, the claimants provided a reasonable and credible explanation for the timing, acted promptly once the evidence was identified, and there is no specific prejudice to the defendants or disruption to the trial. The Denton principles are satisfied in all the circumstances.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Permission granted for the claimants to rely on the witness statement of Mr Ian Elliott.
- Defendants to pay the claimants' costs of the application, summarily assessed at £15,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment