Libyan Investment Authority & Ors v King & Ors [2023] EWHC 265 (Ch) (10 February 2023)

Libyan Investment Authority & Ors v King & Ors [2023] EWHC 265 (Ch) (10 February 2023)

The court found that the claimants failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendants made fraudulent misrepresentations, acted dishonestly as agents, or dishonestly assisted any breach of fiduciary duty. The evidence did not support an inference of dishonesty or conspiracy, and the claimants did not establish reliance or causation of loss. Accordingly, all claims failed on liability and causation.

Citation
[2023] EWHC 265 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Libyan Investment Authority; Claimant: LIA Advisory Services (UK) Limited; Claimant: Maplecross Holdings Investment Company Limited; Defendant: Roger Milner King; Defendant: International Group Limited; Defendant: Beeson Property Investments Limited; Defendant: Stoke Park Estates; Defendant: Charles Montgomery Merry; Defendant: Conrad Strategic Partners Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 February 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil (chancery Division) / Judgment on Liability and Causation; Quantum Reserved for Further Hearing
Outcome
All claims dismissed on liability and causation; quantum not determined.
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Dishonest Assistance, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Measure of Damages, Agency
Commercial Law Equity and Trusts Fraud Fraudulent Misrepresentation Breach of Fiduciary Duty Dishonest Assistance Unlawful Means Conspiracy Measure of Damages +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Libyan Investment Authority

Claimant

LIA Advisory Services (UK) Limited

Claimant

Maplecross Holdings Investment Company Limited

Claimant

Roger Milner King

Defendant

International Group Limited

Defendant

Beeson Property Investments Limited

Defendant

Stoke Park Estates

Defendant

Charles Montgomery Merry

Defendant

Conrad Strategic Partners Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (chancery Division) / Judgment on Liability and Causation; Quantum Reserved for Further Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants made fraudulent misrepresentations regarding the value of the joint venture and hotel site
  2. 2 Whether the defendants owed and breached duties of honesty as agents of the claimants
  3. 3 Whether the defendants dishonestly assisted a breach of fiduciary duty by Mr Layas

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimants failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendants made fraudulent misrepresentations, acted dishonestly as agents, or dishonestly assisted any breach of fiduciary duty. The evidence did not support an inference of dishonesty or conspiracy, and the claimants did not establish reliance or causation of loss. Accordingly, all claims failed on liability and causation.

Court Disposition

All claims dismissed on liability and causation; quantum not determined.

Orders

  • Claims dismissed; no order as to quantum at this stage.