Haseeb, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 679 (09 June 2023)
The sentencing judge was entitled to assess the offence as category 2A with a starting point of 14 years, reduce by one year for mitigation and youth, and impose a five-year extension period given the high culpability, planning, leadership, and antecedents. The sentence was neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 679
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Rohail Haseeb
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed applications for leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Firearms Offences, Sentencing, Dangerousness, Extended Sentence, Appeal Against Sentence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Rohail Haseeb
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessing level 2 harm under the sentencing guidelines
- 2 Whether the extension period of five years was excessive
- 3 Whether proper discount was applied for the applicant's age and role
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was entitled to assess the offence as category 2A with a starting point of 14 years, reduce by one year for mitigation and youth, and impose a five-year extension period given the high culpability, planning, leadership, and antecedents. The sentence was neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle.
Court Disposition
renewed applications for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment