R v Ronald De Souza

R v Ronald De Souza

The conviction was quashed because fresh evidence demonstrated that the police evidence central to the prosecution was unreliable due to proven dishonesty and corruption, making the conviction unsafe.

Parties
Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Ronald De Souza
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal allowed, conviction quashed
Legal Topics
Unsafe Conviction, Fresh Evidence, Police Misconduct, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Unsafe Conviction Fresh Evidence Police Misconduct Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Respondent

Ronald De Souza

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction of Ronald De Souza is unsafe due to fresh evidence of police dishonesty
  2. 2 Whether the evidence of DS Ridgewell was reliable
  3. 3 Whether the appeal should proceed in the absence of the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was quashed because fresh evidence demonstrated that the police evidence central to the prosecution was unreliable due to proven dishonesty and corruption, making the conviction unsafe.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed, conviction quashed

Orders

  • Conviction of Ronald De Souza quashed
  • Registrar to inform Mr De Souza of the outcome and invite further submissions if desired