J J Rhatigan & Co (UK) Ltd v Rosemary Lodge Developments Ltd [2019] EWHC 1152 (TCC) (08 May 2019)

J J Rhatigan & Co (UK) Ltd v Rosemary Lodge Developments Ltd [2019] EWHC 1152 (TCC) (08 May 2019)

The adjudicator's decision should be enforced because any alleged breach of natural justice was not material; the adjudicator addressed the key defence regarding intention to create legal relations, and any omission of evidence was not crucial or determinative.

Citation
[2019] EWHC 1152 (TCC)
Parties
Claimant: J J Rhatigan & Co (UK) Limited; Defendant: Rosemary Lodge Developments Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Commercial Construction Enforcement / Summary Judgment Application to Enforce Adjudicator's Decision
Outcome
Summary judgment granted for the claimant; adjudicator's decision enforced.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Natural Justice, Intention to Create Legal Relations, Summary Judgment, JCT Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J J Rhatigan & Co (UK) Limited

Claimant

Rosemary Lodge Developments Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Construction Enforcement / Summary Judgment Application to Enforce Adjudicator's Decision

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator's decision should be enforced by summary judgment
  2. 2 Whether there was a material breach of natural justice in the adjudication process
  3. 3 Whether there was a binding agreement between the parties

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator's decision should be enforced because any alleged breach of natural justice was not material; the adjudicator addressed the key defence regarding intention to create legal relations, and any omission of evidence was not crucial or determinative.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted for the claimant; adjudicator's decision enforced.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay claimant £1,693,659.69 plus VAT as determined by the adjudicator.