Ranjitkumar, R v

Ranjitkumar, R v

It was wrong to make a compensation order which could only be satisfied by selling the family home, regardless of whether it is a matrimonial or shared family home; the order was set aside as it was punitive and did not properly account for interests in the property.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Roshaan Sooriya Ranjitkumar
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 January 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Compensation Orders, Sentencing, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy to Defraud, False Accounting
Criminal Law Compensation Orders Sentencing Breach of Trust Conspiracy to Defraud False Accounting

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Roshaan Sooriya Ranjitkumar

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the compensation order was punitive, unjust, and inappropriate
  2. 2 Whether the compensation order necessitating sale of the family home was proper
  3. 3 Whether the compensation order took account of the appellant's stepmother's interest in the property

Ratio Decidendi

It was wrong to make a compensation order which could only be satisfied by selling the family home, regardless of whether it is a matrimonial or shared family home; the order was set aside as it was punitive and did not properly account for interests in the property.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • compensation order set aside