Ibstock Group Ltd, R (on the application of) v Rother District Council [2009] EWHC 195 (Admin) (15 January 2009)
It was lawful for the Council to grant planning permission subject to conditions requiring later approval of landscaping and layout details; the relationship between the cemetery extension and landfill site was adequately considered; Waste Local Plan WLP5 was relevant but added nothing to the requirements already imposed by Local Plan Policy BX10.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 195 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Ibstock Group Limited; Defendant: Rother District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment and Summary Assessment of Costs
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Local Plan Compliance, Planning Permission Conditions, Waste Management Policy, Land Use Conflict, Judicial Review Grounds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ibstock Group Limited
Claimant
Rother District Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment and Summary Assessment of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether planning permission complied with Local Plan Policy BX10 in absence of landscaping and mitigation details
- 2 Whether Council failed to have regard to Waste Local Plan WLP5
- 3 Whether sufficient information existed to reasonably grant planning permission
Ratio Decidendi
It was lawful for the Council to grant planning permission subject to conditions requiring later approval of landscaping and layout details; the relationship between the cemetery extension and landfill site was adequately considered; Waste Local Plan WLP5 was relevant but added nothing to the requirements already imposed by Local Plan Policy BX10.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Orders
- Claimant's application for judicial review dismissed
- Defendant awarded full costs as claimed, summarily assessed at £21,472 inclusive of VAT
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment