PARK LANE HOMES (SOUTH EAST) LIMITED (R on the application of) v ROTHER DISTRICT COUNCIL
The Council did not err in law or act irrationally in accepting the Examiner’s finding that the draft Burwash Neighbourhood Development Plan met the basic conditions. There is no statutory or policy requirement for a neighbourhood plan to allocate housing sites or amend development boundaries. The plan’s reliance on the default policy (OVE1) was lawful and did not undermine strategic policies. The procedure adopted was fair and in accordance with the statutory scheme; the Claimant had adequate opportunity to make representations, and no oral hearing was required. The claim for judicial review is dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Park Lane Homes (South East) Limited; Defendant: Rother District Council; Interested Party: Burwash Parish Council; Interested Party: Burwash: Save Our Fields
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Neighbourhood Development Plans, Judicial Review, Statutory Interpretation, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Park Lane Homes (South East) Limited
Claimant
Rother District Council
Defendant
Burwash Parish Council
Interested Party
Burwash: Save Our Fields
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council erred in law in accepting the Examiner’s finding that the draft Burwash Neighbourhood Development Plan met the basic conditions under paragraph 8(2) of Schedule 4B to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, specifically regarding housing allocations and development boundaries.
- 2 Whether the procedure adopted by the Council was procedurally unfair to the Claimant.
Ratio Decidendi
The Council did not err in law or act irrationally in accepting the Examiner’s finding that the draft Burwash Neighbourhood Development Plan met the basic conditions. There is no statutory or policy requirement for a neighbourhood plan to allocate housing sites or amend development boundaries. The plan’s reliance on the default policy (OVE1) was lawful and did not undermine strategic policies. The procedure adopted was fair and in accordance with the statutory scheme; the Claimant had adequate opportunity to make representations, and no oral hearing was required. The claim for judicial review is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The claim for judicial review is dismissed.
- No quashing order or declaration granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment