Clarke v R

Clarke v R

The court held that the burden of proving qualification under section 84 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 lies on the defendant, as a legal burden, and this is justified and proportionate given the structure and purpose of the Act. The Recorder's directions on qualification and summing up were accurate and fair. The sentence of unpaid work was excessive for the circumstances and was substituted with a financial penalty.

Parties
Appellant: Roy Clarke; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From the Crown Court at Manchester
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed.
Legal Topics
Burden of Proof, Qualification to Provide Immigration Services, Reverse Burden, Fair Trial, Sentencing
Criminal Law Immigration Law Burden of Proof Qualification to Provide Immigration Services Reverse Burden Fair Trial Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roy Clarke

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From the Crown Court at Manchester

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the burden of proving qualification under section 84 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 lies on the defendant or the prosecution
  2. 2 Whether the Recorder erred in directing the jury that only physical registration with OISC qualifies a person under the Act
  3. 3 Whether the Recorder's summing up rendered the trial unfair

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the burden of proving qualification under section 84 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 lies on the defendant, as a legal burden, and this is justified and proportionate given the structure and purpose of the Act. The Recorder's directions on qualification and summing up were accurate and fair. The sentence of unpaid work was excessive for the circumstances and was substituted with a financial penalty.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed.

Orders

  • Sentence of unpaid work quashed and replaced with a total fine of £600 and £300 contribution to prosecution costs, payable at a rate to be determined upon submissions by Mr Clarke.