Porter, R v [2001] EWCA Crim 2647; [2001] Ewca Crim 2699 (4th December, 2001)
The refusal to adjourn the trial was unwise but did not render the conviction unsafe due to the strength of the prosecution case; the lack of jury direction on Maloney's evidence was an omission but not fatal; the sentence was excessive given Porter's youth and vulnerability and should be reduced.
- Citation
- [2001] Ewca Crim 2699
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Roy Colin David Porter
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction refused; appeal against sentence allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Rape, False Imprisonment, Indecent Assault, Trial Adjournment, Expert Evidence, Jury Directions, Article 6 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Roy Colin David Porter
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refusal to adjourn trial breached Article 6(3)(b) Human Rights Act 1998
- 2 Whether jury was properly directed regarding co-defendant's evidence
- 3 Appropriateness of sentence length
Ratio Decidendi
The refusal to adjourn the trial was unwise but did not render the conviction unsafe due to the strength of the prosecution case; the lack of jury direction on Maloney's evidence was an omission but not fatal; the sentence was excessive given Porter's youth and vulnerability and should be reduced.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction refused; appeal against sentence allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence reduced from 12 years to 10 years' detention
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment