Frear v Frear & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 1320 (02 December 2008)

Frear v Frear & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 1320 (02 December 2008)

The appellant held a one-half beneficial interest in the property from its purchase, but the mother, believing she owned the whole, purported to dispose of the entire beneficial interest by will. The doctrine of election applies, requiring the appellant to elect between retaining his existing half interest and renouncing the bequest, or accepting the bequest and ceding his existing interest to the estate. In either case, he is entitled to no more than one half of the beneficial interest in the property.

Citation
[2008] EWCA Civ 1320
Parties
Appellant: Roy Frear; Respondents: David Frear and Julie Nicholson (the personal representatives of Mary Frear, deceased)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 December 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, Doctrine of Election, Interpretation of Wills, Beneficial Interest in Property

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roy Frear

Appellant

David Frear and Julie Nicholson (the personal representatives of Mary Frear, deceased)

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division

  1. 1 Whether the appellant had a beneficial interest in the property at the time of the mother's death or merely a right to be bequeathed such an interest
  2. 2 Whether the doctrine of election applies to require the appellant to choose between his existing beneficial interest and the bequest under the will

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant held a one-half beneficial interest in the property from its purchase, but the mother, believing she owned the whole, purported to dispose of the entire beneficial interest by will. The doctrine of election applies, requiring the appellant to elect between retaining his existing half interest and renouncing the bequest, or accepting the bequest and ceding his existing interest to the estate. In either case, he is entitled to no more than one half of the beneficial interest in the property.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed. The appellant is required to elect between retaining his existing half beneficial interest in the property and renouncing the bequest under the will, or accepting the bequest and ceding his existing interest to the estate. In either case, he is entitled to no more than one half of the...