Frear v Frear & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 1320 (02 December 2008)
The appellant held a one-half beneficial interest in the property from its purchase, but the mother, believing she owned the whole, purported to dispose of the entire beneficial interest by will. The doctrine of election applies, requiring the appellant to elect between retaining his existing half interest and renouncing the bequest, or accepting the bequest and ceding his existing interest to the estate. In either case, he is entitled to no more than one half of the beneficial interest in the property.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 1320
- Parties
- Appellant: Roy Frear; Respondents: David Frear and Julie Nicholson (the personal representatives of Mary Frear, deceased)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, Doctrine of Election, Interpretation of Wills, Beneficial Interest in Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roy Frear
Appellant
David Frear and Julie Nicholson (the personal representatives of Mary Frear, deceased)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a beneficial interest in the property at the time of the mother's death or merely a right to be bequeathed such an interest
- 2 Whether the doctrine of election applies to require the appellant to choose between his existing beneficial interest and the bequest under the will
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant held a one-half beneficial interest in the property from its purchase, but the mother, believing she owned the whole, purported to dispose of the entire beneficial interest by will. The doctrine of election applies, requiring the appellant to elect between retaining his existing half interest and renouncing the bequest, or accepting the bequest and ceding his existing interest to the estate. In either case, he is entitled to no more than one half of the beneficial interest in the property.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The appellant is required to elect between retaining his existing half beneficial interest in the property and renouncing the bequest under the will, or accepting the bequest and ceding his existing interest to the estate. In either case, he is entitled to no more than one half of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment