Frear v Frear & Anor
The claimant held a half beneficial interest in the property from the time of its purchase. However, the mother, by her will, purported to dispose of the whole beneficial interest, and the doctrine of election applies. The claimant must elect between retaining his existing half share and renouncing the bequest, or ceding a quarter share to the siblings and taking a quarter under the will. In either case, he is entitled to only half the beneficial interest.
- Parties
- Appellant: Roy Frear; Respondent: David Frear; Respondent: Julie Nicholson (personal representative of Mary Frear, deceased)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trusts, Proprietary Estoppel, Doctrine of Election, Interpretation of Wills
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roy Frear
Appellant
David Frear
Respondent
Julie Nicholson (personal representative of Mary Frear, deceased)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant held a beneficial interest in the property or only a right to have it bequeathed to him
- 2 Whether the doctrine of election applies to the claimant's entitlement under the will
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant held a half beneficial interest in the property from the time of its purchase. However, the mother, by her will, purported to dispose of the whole beneficial interest, and the doctrine of election applies. The claimant must elect between retaining his existing half share and renouncing the bequest, or ceding a quarter share to the siblings and taking a quarter under the will. In either case, he is entitled to only half the beneficial interest.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The precise terms of the order should reflect the claimant's election, but the practical result is that he is entitled to only one half of the beneficial interest in the property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment