Jalla & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Ors [2021] EWHC 2118 (TCC) (20 July 2021)
The court refused the claimants' application for further time, holding that the claimants had already been afforded sufficient opportunity and extensions to serve their evidence and particulars. The logistical and pandemic-related difficulties had been previously considered in setting the timetable. Granting further time would prejudice the defendants' trial preparation and disrupt the fixed trial date, as well as court resources. The claimants bore some responsibility for not adopting a proportionate approach, such as sampling or test cases, and the proposed changes would amount to a significant new case for the defendants to address.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 2118 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Harrison Jalla; Claimant: Abel Chujor & Others; Claimant: The 27,830 Individual Claimants listed in Schedule 1; Claimant: The 479 Nigerian Communities listed in Schedule 2; Defendant: Royal Dutch Shell PLC; Defendant: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited; Defendant: Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Limitation Periods, Oil Pollution, Representative Actions, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harrison Jalla
Claimant
Abel Chujor & Others
Claimant
The 27,830 Individual Claimants listed in Schedule 1
Claimant
The 479 Nigerian Communities listed in Schedule 2
Claimant
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
Defendant
Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited
Defendant
Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants should be granted a further extension of time to serve additional particulars and evidence regarding the date of damage in large-scale oil spill litigation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused the claimants' application for further time, holding that the claimants had already been afforded sufficient opportunity and extensions to serve their evidence and particulars. The logistical and pandemic-related difficulties had been previously considered in setting the timetable. Granting further time would prejudice the defendants' trial preparation and disrupt the fixed trial date, as well as court resources. The claimants bore some responsibility for not adopting a proportionate approach, such as sampling or test cases, and the proposed changes would amount to a significant new case for the defendants to address.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Application for extension of time to serve further particulars and/or evidence in support of claimants' case is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment