Jalla & Ors v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Ltd & Ors
The court determined that the appropriate way forward is to proceed to a preliminary trial of limitation issues as previously ordered, expanded to include all related proceedings. Jurisdictional challenges and threshold issues are to be resolved through this process, as limitation is central to jurisdiction. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Harrison Jalla; Claimant: Abel Chujor; Claimant: HRH The Olugbo (King) of Ugbo Kingdom; Claimant: Prince Akinfemiwa Akinruntan; Claimant: Prince Adeyinka Akinruntan; Defendant: Royal Dutch Shell PLC; Defendant: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited (STASCO); Defendant: Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Limited (SNEPCo)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (environmental Tort) / Case Management Directions and Preliminary Issues Determination
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues on limitation to be tried as ordered, expanded to all proceedings; timetable adjusted; parties to clarify authorisation and status of Akinruntan proceedings; liberty to apply granted.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Limitation Periods, Representative Actions, Nuisance, Negligence, Rylands V Fletcher Liability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harrison Jalla
Claimant
Abel Chujor
Claimant
HRH The Olugbo (King) of Ugbo Kingdom
Claimant
Prince Akinfemiwa Akinruntan
Claimant
Prince Adeyinka Akinruntan
Claimant
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
Defendant
Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited (STASCO)
Defendant
Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Limited (SNEPCo)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (environmental Tort) / Case Management Directions and Preliminary Issues Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction over the claims against STASCO and SNEPCo
- 2 Whether claims are statute-barred by limitation periods under English or Nigerian law
- 3 Whether the claims can proceed as representative actions under CPR 19.6
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the appropriate way forward is to proceed to a preliminary trial of limitation issues as previously ordered, expanded to include all related proceedings. Jurisdictional challenges and threshold issues are to be resolved through this process, as limitation is central to jurisdiction. The court declined to separate out threshold or jurisdictional issues for earlier determination, finding this would not be efficient or proportionate. The timetable for pleadings and evidence was adjusted, and the parties were directed to clarify authorisation and the status of the Akinruntan proceedings.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues on limitation to be tried as ordered, expanded to all proceedings; timetable adjusted; parties to clarify authorisation and status of Akinruntan proceedings; liberty to apply granted.
Orders
- Preliminary issues on limitation to be tried in all proceedings (HT-2017-000383, HT-2020-000143, BL-2019-002334)
- Claimants to file and serve limitation pleadings and evidence by 7 May 2021
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment