Jalla & Anor v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Ltd & Anor [2023] EWHC 424 (TCC) (28 February 2023)
The court found that the claimants failed to prove that oil from the Bonga Spill first impacted the specified communities in 2014-2015. The evidence did not support the claim that oil remained stranded and was later remobilised to cause actionable damage years after the spill. The applicable limitation period is...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 424 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Harrison Jalla; Claimant: Abel Chujor; Claimant: 27,830 Individual Claimants (Schedule 1); Claimant: 479 Nigerian Communities (Schedule 2); Defendant: Royal Dutch Shell plc; Defendant: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Ltd; Defendant: Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Environmental Tort / Judgment on Preliminary Issues (date of Damage, Limitation, Authority)
- Outcome
- Claims dismissed on preliminary issues; claims are statute-barred and/or not established on the evidence.
- Legal Topics
- Oil Pollution, Limitation Period, Jurisdiction, Representative Actions, Nuisance, Negligence, Rylands V Fletcher Liability, Authority of Solicitors, Remediation of Environmental Damage
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harrison Jalla
Claimant
Abel Chujor
Claimant
27,830 Individual Claimants (Schedule 1)
Claimant
479 Nigerian Communities (Schedule 2)
Claimant
Royal Dutch Shell plc
Defendant
Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Ltd
Defendant
Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Environmental Tort / Judgment on Preliminary Issues (date of Damage, Limitation, Authority)
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the applicable limitation period under Nigerian law for these claims?
- 2 Did oil from the Bonga Spill reach and cause actionable damage to the specified communities on the dates alleged?
- 3 Do the claimants' solicitors have authority to act for all claimants in the Jalla 2 proceedings under Nigerian law?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimants failed to prove that oil from the Bonga Spill first impacted the specified communities in 2014-2015. The evidence did not support the claim that oil remained stranded and was later remobilised to cause actionable damage years after the spill. The applicable limitation period is five years under Nigerian law, and the claims are statute-barred. The claimants' solicitors did not establish authority to act for all claimants in the Jalla 2 proceedings as required by Nigerian law.
Court Disposition
Claims dismissed on preliminary issues; claims are statute-barred and/or not established on the evidence.
Orders
- Claims against Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Ltd and Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Ltd are dismissed as statute-barred.
- Court declines jurisdiction over claims against SNEPCo due to failure of anchor claim against STASCO.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment