ALAME & Others v ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC & Anor.

ALAME & Others v ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC & Anor.

The court held that while a GLO is appropriate in principle for the Bille Individuals and Ogale Individuals claims, it cannot be made until common issues are clearly defined and sufficient information is provided for each claimant. Claimants must supply additional details in the schedules of information, including the specific oil spill(s) relied on, location and timing of alleged damage, and basis of land rights. In the Ogale Individuals Claim, each claimant must confirm Leigh Day’s authority. This information is necessary for proper case management, selection of lead claimants, and to allow Defendants to know the case they must meet. The GLO application is adjourned pending compliance....

Parties
Claimant: Alame & Others (Bille Individuals); Claimant: Chief Ibitamino D Minapakama & Others (Bille Community); Claimant: Okpabi & Others (Ogale Community); Claimant: Ejire Awala & Others (Ogale Individuals); Defendant: Royal Dutch Shell PLC; Defendant: The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil (environmental Tort/group Litigation) / Case Management Ruling on Group Litigation Order (glo) and Directions
Outcome
GLO application adjourned; directions issued for further information; transfer to QBD to follow GLO order.
Legal Topics
Oil Pollution Liability, Group Litigation Order (glo), Statutory Compensation, Negligence, Nuisance, Rylands V Fletcher, Trespass, Jurisdiction, Case Management
Environmental Law Tort Law Civil Procedure Oil Pollution Liability Group Litigation Order (glo) Statutory Compensation Negligence Nuisance +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alame & Others (Bille Individuals)

Claimant

Chief Ibitamino D Minapakama & Others (Bille Community)

Claimant

Okpabi & Others (Ogale Community)

Claimant

Ejire Awala & Others (Ogale Individuals)

Claimant

Royal Dutch Shell PLC

Defendant

The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (environmental Tort/group Litigation) / Case Management Ruling on Group Litigation Order (glo) and Directions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a Group Litigation Order (GLO) should be made for the Bille Individuals and Ogale Individuals claims
  2. 2 What information is required for entry onto the group register and schedules of information for claimants
  3. 3 Whether the proceedings should be transferred from the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) to the Queen’s Bench Division (QBD)

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while a GLO is appropriate in principle for the Bille Individuals and Ogale Individuals claims, it cannot be made until common issues are clearly defined and sufficient information is provided for each claimant. Claimants must supply additional details in the schedules of information, including the specific oil spill(s) relied on, location and timing of alleged damage, and basis of land rights. In the Ogale Individuals Claim, each claimant must confirm Leigh Day’s authority. This information is necessary for proper case management, selection of lead claimants, and to allow Defendants to know the case they must meet. The GLO application is adjourned pending compliance....

Court Disposition

GLO application adjourned; directions issued for further information; transfer to QBD to follow GLO order.

Orders

  • Claimants must provide additional details for each individual in the Bille Individuals and Ogale Individuals claims as specified in the ruling.
  • Ogale Individuals Claimants must confirm Leigh Day’s authority to act.