Spire Healthcare Ltd v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc

Spire Healthcare Ltd v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc

The claims arising from Mr Paterson's conduct are attributable to two distinct original causes—one for negligently performed sub-total mastectomies (Group 1) and another for deliberate unnecessary surgeries (Group 2). Each group is causally distinct and cannot be aggregated as a single original cause under the policy. Spire is entitled to two indemnity limits.

Parties
Claimant: Spire Healthcare Limited; Defendant: Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
claim allowed
Legal Topics
Aggregation Clauses, Policy Interpretation, Quantum of Damages, Causation, Medical Malpractice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Spire Healthcare Limited

Claimant

Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Insurance Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial

  1. 1 Whether claims arising from Mr Paterson's conduct should be aggregated under the insurance policy as one or two original causes
  2. 2 Whether the quantum of damages, costs, and defence costs for Group 2 claims exceeded £10 million

Ratio Decidendi

The claims arising from Mr Paterson's conduct are attributable to two distinct original causes—one for negligently performed sub-total mastectomies (Group 1) and another for deliberate unnecessary surgeries (Group 2). Each group is causally distinct and cannot be aggregated as a single original cause under the policy. Spire is entitled to two indemnity limits.

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • Spire's claim succeeds; court will hear counsel on the terms of the order at hand-down.