Carrie v Tolkien
The claim is struck out because the claimant consented to continued publication by not removing the posting, the amendment to the claim form is disallowed as it constitutes a new claim outside the limitation period, and there is no evidence of substantial publication prior to claimant's discovery, rendering the claim an abuse of process.
- Parties
- Claimant: Christopher Carrie; Defendant: Royd Tolkien
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment/strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Claim struck out; amendment disallowed; permission to extend time for application granted.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Consent in Publication, Abuse of Process, Amendment of Pleadings, Limitation Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Carrie
Claimant
Royd Tolkien
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment/strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim should be struck out for consent to publication
- 2 Whether the amendment to the claim form outside the limitation period should be disallowed
- 3 Whether there was substantial publication prior to claimant's discovery of the posting
Ratio Decidendi
The claim is struck out because the claimant consented to continued publication by not removing the posting, the amendment to the claim form is disallowed as it constitutes a new claim outside the limitation period, and there is no evidence of substantial publication prior to claimant's discovery, rendering the claim an abuse of process.
Court Disposition
Claim struck out; amendment disallowed; permission to extend time for application granted.
Orders
- Claim struck out for consent and abuse of process.
- Amendment to claim form disallowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment