PQ & Anor v RS & Ors (Rev 1) [2019] EWHC 1643 (Ch) (04 July 2019)
Trustees have power under clause 8(2)(i) of the 1987 Appointment to revoke existing trusts and create new discretionary trusts for the benefit of RS and TU, including all their children regardless of legitimacy, and the proposed appointment is a proper exercise of that power.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 1643 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimants: PQ and another; Defendant: RS; Defendant: W; Defendant: X; Defendant: V
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Dispute / Judgment on Trustees' Application for Approval of Appointment
- Outcome
- Trustees' application approved; power to appoint confirmed; proposed appointment sanctioned.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Trust Instruments, Legitimacy and Beneficiary Status, Trustee Powers, Confidentiality Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PQ and another
Claimants
RS
Defendant
W
Defendant
X
Defendant
V
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Trust Dispute / Judgment on Trustees' Application for Approval of Appointment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees have power to appoint new trusts including illegitimate children as beneficiaries
- 2 Whether proposed appointment is a proper exercise of trustee powers
- 3 Whether confidentiality/anonymity order is justified
Ratio Decidendi
Trustees have power under clause 8(2)(i) of the 1987 Appointment to revoke existing trusts and create new discretionary trusts for the benefit of RS and TU, including all their children regardless of legitimacy, and the proposed appointment is a proper exercise of that power.
Court Disposition
Trustees' application approved; power to appoint confirmed; proposed appointment sanctioned.
Orders
- Trustees authorised to execute Deed of Appointment creating new discretionary trusts for children and remoter issue (whether legitimate, illegitimate, legitimated or adopted) of RS and TU.
- Anonymity and confidentiality order continued to protect children's identities and financial information.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment