Marzan v RSPCA [2016] EWHC 1231 (Admin) (01 March 2016)
The Crown Court applied the correct legal test and there was evidence capable of supporting the conclusion that the police officer genuinely and reasonably believed entry was necessary to prevent serious damage to property. The High Court cannot interfere unless the decision was wrong in law, which was not established.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 1231 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Marzan; Defendant: RSPCA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Case Stated / High Court Review of Crown Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Entry, Police Powers, Admissibility of Evidence, Animal Welfare Act 2006, Section 17(1)(e) Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marzan
Claimant
RSPCA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Case Stated / High Court Review of Crown Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether police entry under section 17(1)(e) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 was unlawful
- 2 Whether the police officer genuinely believed entry was necessary to prevent serious damage to property (dogs)
- 3 Whether that belief was based on reasonable grounds
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown Court applied the correct legal test and there was evidence capable of supporting the conclusion that the police officer genuinely and reasonably believed entry was necessary to prevent serious damage to property. The High Court cannot interfere unless the decision was wrong in law, which was not established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by way of case stated is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment