Polar Park Enterprises v Allason
The High Court lacked jurisdiction to permit enforcement of a writ of possession because the licence was for money's worth, making the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 applicable; thus, enforcement must be in the county court.
- Parties
- Claimant: Polar Park Enterprises; Defendant: Rupert Allason
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment Application to Set Aside Part of Order for Want of Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application allowed; paragraphs 2 and 3 of the January order set aside for want of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- Possession Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Licences for Money's Worth, Protection From Eviction Act 1977
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Polar Park Enterprises
Claimant
Rupert Allason
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Application to Set Aside Part of Order for Want of Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to permit enforcement of a writ of possession under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977
- 2 Whether the licence in question was for money's worth and thus not excluded under the Act
- 3 Whether the defendant was a lawful occupier protected by the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacked jurisdiction to permit enforcement of a writ of possession because the licence was for money's worth, making the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 applicable; thus, enforcement must be in the county court.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; paragraphs 2 and 3 of the January order set aside for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the 22 January order set aside.
- Proceedings to be transferred to the appropriate county court for execution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment