Polar Park Enterprises v Allason

Polar Park Enterprises v Allason

The High Court lacked jurisdiction to permit enforcement of a writ of possession because the licence was for money's worth, making the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 applicable; thus, enforcement must be in the county court.

Parties
Claimant: Polar Park Enterprises; Defendant: Rupert Allason
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Application to Set Aside Part of Order for Want of Jurisdiction
Outcome
Application allowed; paragraphs 2 and 3 of the January order set aside for want of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Possession Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Licences for Money's Worth, Protection From Eviction Act 1977

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Polar Park Enterprises

Claimant

Rupert Allason

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Judgment Application to Set Aside Part of Order for Want of Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to permit enforcement of a writ of possession under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977
  2. 2 Whether the licence in question was for money's worth and thus not excluded under the Act
  3. 3 Whether the defendant was a lawful occupier protected by the Act

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court lacked jurisdiction to permit enforcement of a writ of possession because the licence was for money's worth, making the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 applicable; thus, enforcement must be in the county court.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; paragraphs 2 and 3 of the January order set aside for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the 22 January order set aside.
  • Proceedings to be transferred to the appropriate county court for execution.