Director of Public Prosecutions v Clutterbuck [2006] EWHC 3447 (Admin) (23 November 2006)

Director of Public Prosecutions v Clutterbuck [2006] EWHC 3447 (Admin) (23 November 2006)

The magistrates lawfully exercised their discretion in imposing an 11-month community order, taking into account all relevant factors and not acting to avoid sex offender registration. Their refusal to extend the order was also lawful, as they properly considered the restriction on liberty, previous good character, and pre-sentence report.

Citation
[2006] EWHC 3447 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Defendant: Russell Clutterbuck
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Community Orders, Sex Offender Registration, Judicial Discretion, Probation Requirements
Criminal Law Sentencing Community Orders Sex Offender Registration Judicial Discretion Probation Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Claimant

Russell Clutterbuck

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether it was lawful for magistrates to impose a community order of less than 12 months to avoid sex offender registration
  2. 2 Whether magistrates acted lawfully in refusing to extend the community order to accommodate the Sex Offenders Groupwork Programme

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrates lawfully exercised their discretion in imposing an 11-month community order, taking into account all relevant factors and not acting to avoid sex offender registration. Their refusal to extend the order was also lawful, as they properly considered the restriction on liberty, previous good character, and pre-sentence report.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • assessment order for legal assistance granted to respondent