Ashton, R. v

Ashton, R. v

The applicant has made very good progress in prison but has not demonstrated exceptional progress as required by the criteria; the October 2013 adjudication and concerns about maturity and practical application of learning preclude a reduction of tariff at this stage.

Parties
Claimant: Regina; Defendant: Ryan Ashton
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Tariff Review
Outcome
application for tariff reduction refused
Legal Topics
Tariff Review, Indeterminate Sentence, Exceptional Progress, Detention During Her Majesty’s Pleasure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Claimant

Ryan Ashton

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application for Tariff Review

  1. 1 Has the applicant demonstrated exceptional progress in prison warranting a reduction of tariff?
  2. 2 Does the applicant's disciplinary record and completion of courses meet the criteria for exceptional progress?

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant has made very good progress in prison but has not demonstrated exceptional progress as required by the criteria; the October 2013 adjudication and concerns about maturity and practical application of learning preclude a reduction of tariff at this stage.

Court Disposition

application for tariff reduction refused