R v Ryan Barton

R v Ryan Barton

There was no material irregularity in the imposition of the deprivation order; the defence was aware of the application, had opportunity to make submissions, and no evidence was presented of unfair effects on the appellant.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Ryan Barton
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Deprivation Order, Sentencing, Stalking, Procedural Fairness
Criminal Law Deprivation Order Sentencing Stalking Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Ryan Barton

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the deprivation order for the appellant's mobile phone was imposed without proper consideration under section 155 of the Sentencing Act
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was denied an opportunity to make representations regarding the deprivation order

Ratio Decidendi

There was no material irregularity in the imposition of the deprivation order; the defence was aware of the application, had opportunity to make submissions, and no evidence was presented of unfair effects on the appellant.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Deprivation order for the appellant's mobile phone upheld