R v Ryan Brown

R v Ryan Brown

The total sentence of 50 months' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the gravity and multiplicity of the offences, the aggravating factors, and the limited credit for late pleas. The sentencing judge's approach to totality and uplift was appropriate.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant: Ryan Brown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
renewed application for permission to appeal against sentence dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Domestic Violence, Harassment, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Witness Intimidation, Threat to Disclose Private Sexual Images
Criminal Law Sentencing Domestic Violence Harassment Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm Witness Intimidation Threat to Disclose Private Sexual Images

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Ryan Brown

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the total sentence of 50 months' imprisonment was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to make sufficient allowance for totality
  3. 3 Whether the uplift in sentence for harassment was justified

Ratio Decidendi

The total sentence of 50 months' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the gravity and multiplicity of the offences, the aggravating factors, and the limited credit for late pleas. The sentencing judge's approach to totality and uplift was appropriate.

Court Disposition

renewed application for permission to appeal against sentence dismissed