Cahill, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 756 (21 June 2024)
The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive. The starting point for the lead offence was justified given the borderline leading/significant role. The uplift for supervision/exploitation of the complainant was proper and not double counting. The discount for mitigation and totality was fair. Totality was properly reflected in the leading count, and the overall sentence was proportionate to the offending behaviour.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 756
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Ryan Cahill
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Totality Principle, Production of Controlled Drugs, Burglary, Assault, Attempted Theft, Damaging Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Ryan Cahill
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the principle of totality was properly applied
- 3 Whether double counting occurred regarding conduct towards the complainant
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive. The starting point for the lead offence was justified given the borderline leading/significant role. The uplift for supervision/exploitation of the complainant was proper and not double counting. The discount for mitigation and totality was fair. Totality was properly reflected in the leading count, and the overall sentence was proportionate to the offending behaviour.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment