K v S

K v S

The Tribunal's decision to exclude the expert report was a procedural/case management decision within its powers under section 34, made with due process and after giving K a reasonable opportunity to be heard. There was no failure of procedural fairness or serious irregularity under section 68. Procedural Order 5 was not an award and thus not subject to challenge under section 68.

Parties
Claimant: K; Defendant: S
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 July 2019
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Challenge (section 68 Arbitration Act 1996) / Judgment on Application to Set Aside/remit Procedural Order
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Serious Irregularity, Procedural Fairness, Case Management, Admissibility of Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

K

Claimant

S

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Arbitration Challenge (section 68 Arbitration Act 1996) / Judgment on Application to Set Aside/remit Procedural Order

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal's exclusion of an expert report constituted a serious irregularity under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996
  2. 2 Whether Procedural Order 5 was an award capable of challenge under section 68
  3. 3 Whether there was a failure of due process or procedural fairness

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's decision to exclude the expert report was a procedural/case management decision within its powers under section 34, made with due process and after giving K a reasonable opportunity to be heard. There was no failure of procedural fairness or serious irregularity under section 68. Procedural Order 5 was not an award and thus not subject to challenge under section 68.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed