London Borough of Brent v S
The injunction against S leaving the jurisdiction was discharged because the risks associated with travel to Pakistan were outweighed by S's powerful personal interests and emotional needs, and the opportunity to travel may not arise again if he wishes to remain in the UK. The best interests of S were not served by...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Petitioner: London Borough of Brent; Defendant: S
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Inherent Jurisdiction / Judgment
- Outcome
- injunction discharged; passport to be returned to S
- Legal Topics
- Inherent Jurisdiction, Passport Order, Injunction, Best Interests of Child, Leave to Remain, Travel Restrictions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London Borough of Brent
Petitioner
S
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application Under Inherent Jurisdiction / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the injunction prohibiting S from leaving the jurisdiction should be continued
- 2 Whether S's best interests are served by allowing him to travel to Pakistan
- 3 Potential immigration consequences if S locates his family
Ratio Decidendi
The injunction against S leaving the jurisdiction was discharged because the risks associated with travel to Pakistan were outweighed by S's powerful personal interests and emotional needs, and the opportunity to travel may not arise again if he wishes to remain in the UK. The best interests of S were not served by continuing the injunction.
Court Disposition
injunction discharged; passport to be returned to S
Orders
- Order prohibiting S from leaving the jurisdiction discharged
- Solicitor directed to return S's passport forthwith
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment