S Local Authority v T, UN & Ors (Rev 1)
The threshold criteria under s31(2) Children Act 1989 are satisfied for all children due to significant sexual activity and abuse between siblings, failure by UN and WN to maintain boundaries and protect, and their knowledge or wilful blindness to the risk. Welfare best interests require care orders for E, F, L, P, Q, A, and placement and adoption order for T. Adoption for T is justified as 'nothing else will do' to ensure safety and permanence.
- Parties
- Applicant: S Local Authority; First Respondent: UN; Second Respondent: WN; Third Respondent: Ms B; Fourth Respondent: Mr Y; Fifth Respondent: Mr D; Sixth Respondent: Mr Z; Seventh Respondent: R; Eighth to Thirteenth Respondents: The Children (E, F, L, A, P, Q, T); Fourteenth Respondent: Mr C
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Final Composite Hearing (fact Finding and Welfare Determination)
- Outcome
- Care orders made for E, F, L, P, Q, A; placement and adoption order made for T; parental consent to adoption dispensed with.
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Placement Orders, Threshold Criteria, Sexual Abuse, Neglect, Welfare Best Interests, Adoption, Contact Arrangements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S Local Authority
Applicant
UN
First Respondent
WN
Second Respondent
Ms B
Third Respondent
Mr Y
Fourth Respondent
Mr D
Fifth Respondent
Mr Z
Sixth Respondent
R
Seventh Respondent
The Children (E, F, L, A, P, Q, T)
Eighth to Thirteenth Respondents
Mr C
Fourteenth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Final Composite Hearing (fact Finding and Welfare Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether threshold criteria under s31(2) Children Act 1989 are satisfied for each child
- 2 Basis for satisfaction of threshold criteria
- 3 Extent of sexual activity and abuse between children
Ratio Decidendi
The threshold criteria under s31(2) Children Act 1989 are satisfied for all children due to significant sexual activity and abuse between siblings, failure by UN and WN to maintain boundaries and protect, and their knowledge or wilful blindness to the risk. Welfare best interests require care orders for E, F, L, P, Q, A, and placement and adoption order for T. Adoption for T is justified as 'nothing else will do' to ensure safety and permanence.
Court Disposition
Care orders made for E, F, L, P, Q, A; placement and adoption order made for T; parental consent to adoption dispensed with.
Orders
- Care order for E
- Care order for F (placement with mother)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment