Corwn Prosecution Service v S
The magistrates erred in law by stopping the case at the no case to answer stage; there was sufficient evidence of joint enterprise and encouragement by S for the case to proceed. The inconsistencies cited were minor and did not justify dismissal. The appeal is allowed and the matter remitted for trial by a differently constituted Bench.
- Parties
- Claimant: Crown Prosecution Service; Defendant: S
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (case Stated) / Appeal Against Dismissal at No Case to Answer Stage
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; matter remitted for trial
- Legal Topics
- No Case to Answer, Joint Enterprise, Evidential Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crown Prosecution Service
Claimant
S
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (case Stated) / Appeal Against Dismissal at No Case to Answer Stage
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the magistrates erred in law in finding there was no case to answer against the defendant S
- 2 Whether the evidence, taken at its highest, was sufficient to require an answer under the Galbraith test
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrates erred in law by stopping the case at the no case to answer stage; there was sufficient evidence of joint enterprise and encouragement by S for the case to proceed. The inconsistencies cited were minor and did not justify dismissal. The appeal is allowed and the matter remitted for trial by a differently constituted Bench.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; matter remitted for trial
Orders
- Matter remitted to Blackpool Youth Court for trial by a differently constituted Bench
- Costs payable from central funds in the sum of £2,281.25 including VAT
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment