S v S [2008] EWHC 519 (Fam) (19 March 2008)

S v S [2008] EWHC 519 (Fam) (19 March 2008)

The District Judge was entitled to make a joint lives periodical payments order based on the evidence of the parties' circumstances, the uncertainty over the husband's future income, and the wife's limited earning capacity. The judge's approach was not plainly wrong, did not ignore relevant statutory provisions, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] EWHC 519 (Fam)
Parties
Applicant: S; Respondent: S
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief Appeal (financial Remedy) / Appeal From District Judge to High Court (family Division)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Ancillary Relief, Periodical Payments, Clean Break, Earning Capacity, Standard of Living, Housing Needs, Section 25 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
Family Law Ancillary Relief Periodical Payments Clean Break Earning Capacity Standard of Living Housing Needs Section 25 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 13
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S

Applicant

S

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Ancillary Relief Appeal (financial Remedy) / Appeal From District Judge to High Court (family Division)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the District Judge erred in awarding joint lives periodical payments rather than a term order
  2. 2 Whether the wife's earning capacity was properly assessed
  3. 3 Whether the wife's housing needs were reasonably determined

Ratio Decidendi

The District Judge was entitled to make a joint lives periodical payments order based on the evidence of the parties' circumstances, the uncertainty over the husband's future income, and the wife's limited earning capacity. The judge's approach was not plainly wrong, did not ignore relevant statutory provisions, and was within the proper exercise of discretion. The error regarding the husband's bonus did not invalidate the fairness of the overall award.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The District Judge's order for joint lives periodical payments at £50,000 per annum stands.